Bridging Up the Gaps in Darwin's Hypothesis of Evolution
Right from the beginning at the time Darwin proposed the Hypothesis of Evolutions in 1870's, there have been two major difficulties for him and his followers to overcome :
I. There have been no or little evidence in fossils unearthed so far that suggested existence of "intermediaries" between spieces such that an objective view on history of evolutions (i.e., a clearly plotted "path" on how one spiece evolved into another) can not be charted.
II. There have been no scientific elaborations, even a hypothetical one, on how evolutions were or to be done. There are arguments that "natural selection" process give rise to conditions that favour certain kind of "hidden" genetic factors which contribute to evolutions or mutations of species. However, apart from the fact that there is lack of experiments under controlled environment to support this premise, it also open up the possibility of "intelligently designed creations", which contradict the hypothesis of evolutions and natural selections.
In response to the arguments mentioned above, I suggest the following Hypothesis :
A) "New" spieces came to existence as a result of "Mutations" instead of "gradual Evolutions". The causes of such mutuations can be drastic change in the evironment (e.g., exposing to intensive radiation that change structure of DNA...etc.).
B) Subsequent Evolutions or "Refinement" of a spiece is a result of interactions between this particular spiece and the environment such that, the higher its capability to change the environment, the greater extent that it can "evolve" from the original "base".
In the following sections, I will try to organize some researches or refer to research works by other scientists to support my hypothesis. Any comments, suggestions, critics from you are heartly welcome.